At the Encyclopedia Foundation, we are well familiar with the old
saying, “When you are busy fighting alligators, it’s difficult to
remember that your job was to drain the swamp.” Sometimes, a thing you
must do to accomplish your goal takes so much effort, it can seem like
you forgot your original goal.
Consider the importance of
preserving knowledge, the goal of the Encyclopedia Foundation. How do
you do that? You make a plan. But here’s the funny thing, you know
just where the “knowledge” is, in the 21st century it is everywhere and
freely available, it’s the “preserving” you don’t have.
So you
start working on the “preserving”. That can take a lot – and it has.
The finding and purchasing of the first house, and its renovation, for
starters. But you need a place for the books. A book is no good
without a “library” of some sort. Are you ready for the books now? No,
you aren’t, the “library” is no good without a “librarian”, so you have
to arrange things so that there can be on site maintenance and upkeep
and such.
And it helps to have a program that can make the
Encyclopedia Foundation financially self-sufficient. So that needs to
be worked on, too.
Then, you can start getting books. Had you
done so before, they’d be sitting in the rain, or in an abandoned house.
But now you can get the books.
But did you notice that “books” and “knowledge” are two different words?
The
goal is preserving “knowledge”. In actuality, you may preserve
knowledge with a really, really good memory, and passing it on to a
young assistant who does the same thing. And for some surprisingly
large amounts of knowledge, that can work well. But for the knowledge
of mankind, it is not only handier, but essential, that we take
advantage of the method of knowledge preservation called “writing”.
Such “writings” are put together in “books”. So you need books – not
because “books” are your goal, but because they are the means to the end
of preserving knowledge.
Seems a silly distinction, but it’s
not. If we were only about preserving books – instead of knowledge –
then we’d be focusing on how to create a sealed environment that
preserves a paper book for ten thousand years. Toss in an Archie comic
and you’re done! But recognizing that it’s the knowledge that’s
essential, we knew we’d have to take books with knowledge, and
transcribe the words in them on to metal plates. That’s a more durable
medium, and will allow the words of the original paper books to be
preserved for 10,000 years.
But that’s still not enough. If we
can say that it’s not the book that’s important, but the “words”, then
we must also realize that it’s not the “words” that are important, but
the “knowledge” the words represent.
Imagine a book that would
solve every problem you have, and help you immeasurably. And now
imagine it is in Sanskrit, but that you don’t even know it’s Sanskrit,
just that your happiness and safety depend on knowing what it means.
That would be frustrating.
Yet
in any project involving the preservation of knowledge, we must realize
that when we store that knowledge on metal plates, with written words,
that we are still trying to preserve knowledge. Not just metal plates
with marks.
It is daunting to realize just how long 10,000 years
is and how much can go wrong. It is not just a matter of planning for
if civilization has an interruption. For in such a case, the Foundation
would still exist, the books would still be there, the knowledge could
be shared, and things put back on track. But we must do more. We must
plan for in case the Foundation as an entity collapses, too. So that
the books will carry on, and be understandable, to anyone who finds
them, even if it’s 300 years after a collapse. Or 3,000.
In
another article we spoke of the need for a Rosetta Disc with 1,000 of
the world’s languages on them, and how we would at least be having
language dictionaries of the five major languages of Earth. And we
believe that in the next ten thousand years, given trends in “language
freezing” that there will always be someone, even if they are a
wandering savage, who speaks some form of one of those five languages.
It
would seem that then we would be done. But no. What if the savage is
illiterate? Another article will explain the choices in some of the
books we are preserving, including children’s educational books. But
such will do no good if they cannot be read. A third generation
post-atomic war savage – to take the dramatic example! – may be a great
hunter, but have not ever been taught to read. He knows English, but
cannot read it.
So the vault will be very important – it must
teach the savage to read the books it preserves. It must let him know
the marks on metal mean something, and that he can learn them. And it
can leave nothing to chance.
Pictographs are notoriously
unreliable. No one looks at a symbol of a bird and thinks “birds fly,
that’s an easy way of travelling like a god, travel takes you to distant
lands, therefore this symbol means ‘far’!”, but that is about how most
pictographs work. Even things as simple as an arrow – well, look at
one, do you see how while you see it pointing in one direction, that the
three lines are all pointing in the opposite direction? Three being
more than one, wouldn’t a reasonable savage believe it was pointing to
the left instead of right? If he caught on that it was a directional
marker at all…
There are enormous difficulties to this, but they
are not insurmountable. How we will surmount them will be detailed in
another article. Suffice that you know from this article, that there is
more to preserving knowledge than having a book, or any number of
books. Much more.
The preparations – the “fighting of
alligators” – cannot let us lose sight of the swamp draining job of
preserving knowledge. But such “alligators” of preparation do need to
be fought and conquered, or the real goal won’t ever succeed. Such work
can seem boring and off topic – fixing houses, researching books,
researching other time vaults, studying various long term organizations,
coming up with esoteric solutions to fabulously unlikely future
problems - but it’s all needful.
In fact – essential.
No comments:
Post a Comment